You've got to be kidding me, right? This is what all the fuss is about?
I think she looks great.
Thursday, July 26, 2007
huh??
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
About Me
- Natasha Beccaria
- Long Island, New York, United States
- Visit us at www.natashabeccariaphotography.com
6 comments:
Hey you clever girl! Where did you get that? I looked and looked...
Wow! Would you get a load of THOSE!
I know right? seriously... they're practically falling out of her shirt...
NOT!
I just read somewhere that The Washington Post wrote a 700 word article on this particular topic... WHAT A WASTE of paper!
yeah, well, when the media can't think of something intelligent to say, or some comment worthy of the content of one's speech, let's all resort to sexism. sigh. enough already. What was she TALKING about? Isn't that the point?
This is part of a mass email i get from time to time about her campaign...
"Would you believe that The Washington Post wrote a 746-word article on Hillary's cleavage?
Apparently, it was showing when she gave a speech in the Senate about the skyrocketing cost of higher education. Now, I've seen some off-topic press coverage -- but talking about body parts? That is grossly inappropriate.
Frankly, focusing on women's bodies instead of their ideas is insulting. It's insulting to every woman who has ever tried to be taken seriously in a business meeting. It's insulting to our daughters -- and our sons -- who are constantly pressured by the media to grow up too fast."
Umm....I'm going to be the prudie oddball here and say it's too much people. For a presidential candidate? too much. Though I agree too many articles and attention paid.
That is not just a low-cut cami, there is a visible valley there. NG.
welll...with all the attention paid to it, and not to her speech, I'd hope it's safe to say she won't be experimenting in this area again.
Post a Comment